User Tools
project-wiki:design_reviews:subsystem_engineering_review
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
project-wiki:design_reviews:subsystem_engineering_review [2022/09/09 11:27] cds4byu [Evaluation Rubrics] |
project-wiki:design_reviews:subsystem_engineering_review [2023/08/30 16:23] (current) bdj2 [Evaluation Rubrics] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| - | The Subsystem Engineering design review occurs in February at a date negotiated between the team and the | + | The Subsystem Engineering design review occurs in late February |
| pod instructor. The team will propose a date in the Project Milestones Table. | pod instructor. The team will propose a date in the Project Milestones Table. | ||
| consistent with the instructor and the external review coaches' | consistent with the instructor and the external review coaches' | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| finding and making plans to remove any weaknesses present. | finding and making plans to remove any weaknesses present. | ||
| - | ==== Questions | + | ==== Artifact Submission for Subsystem Engineering |
| + | |||
| + | In preparation for the Subsystem Engineering review, the team will prepare and submit a pdf file containing the artifacts listed below. These artifacts should answer the questions, "What is the complete system design, including the subsystem designs and their integration?" | ||
| + | |||
| + | The submitted artifacts and the review should demonstrate | ||
| + | that the design has evolved | ||
| + | enough to meet the requirements for the end of Subsystem Engineering. Satisfactorily | ||
| + | addressing the questions above constitute the minimum requirements for completion of | ||
| + | Subsystem Engineering. | ||
| + | |||
| + | While not required, it is helpful for both the team and the reviewers to include | ||
| + | a measured performance memo at the front of the submitted artifacts. | ||
| + | This memo | ||
| + | should: (a) highlight measurements that show the subsystems work properly, and | ||
| + | (b) reference artifacts that show more detail on these measurements. | ||
| + | The presence or absence of the summary memo will not affect the review grade. | ||
| - | - What is the complete system design, including the subsystem designs and their integration? | ||
| - Primary Artifacts: | - Primary Artifacts: | ||
| - | * No primary artifacts exist for the design. | ||
| - | - Supporting Artifacts: | ||
| - | * System Design Package (including ,at a minimum, bill of materials, system and subsystem assembly drawings, part drawings for all custom parts, and interface definitions for subsystem interfaces). Pay close attention to the details described on [[https:// | ||
| - | - How do you know that the subsystems independently meet the Project Success Agreement and other requirements and will be compatible with one another? | ||
| - | - Primary artifacts: | ||
| * Measured performance summary for each subsystem | * Measured performance summary for each subsystem | ||
| - | * Requirements matrix for each subsystem, including | + | * Requirements matrix |
| * Measured and predicted performance summary for the system | * Measured and predicted performance summary for the system | ||
| - | * System requirements matrix with predicted values for performance measures | + | * System requirements matrix |
| - Supporting Artifacts: | - Supporting Artifacts: | ||
| + | * System Design Package (including ,at a minimum, bill of materials or software bill of materials, system and subsystem assembly drawings, part drawings for all custom parts, and interface definitions for subsystem interfaces). Pay close attention to the details described on [[https:// | ||
| * Up-to-date approved Project Success Agreement, revised as necessary | * Up-to-date approved Project Success Agreement, revised as necessary | ||
| * Test results obtained using models and/or prototypes, for both the subsystems and the system. Pay special attention to Figure 1 ([[https:// | * Test results obtained using models and/or prototypes, for both the subsystems and the system. Pay special attention to Figure 1 ([[https:// | ||
| Line 69: | Line 79: | ||
| [{{ project-wiki: | [{{ project-wiki: | ||
| - | ==== Content ==== | ||
| - | |||
| - | The submitted artifacts and the review should demonstrate | ||
| - | that the design has evolved | ||
| - | enough to meet the requirements for the end of Subsystem Engineering. | ||
| - | artifacts should address the questions listed above. | ||
| - | addressing these questions constitute the minimum requirements for completion of | ||
| - | Subsystem Engineering. | ||
| - | |||
| - | While not required, it is helpful for both the team and the reviewers to include | ||
| - | a measured performance memo at the front of the submitted artifacts. | ||
| - | This memo | ||
| - | should: (a) highlight measurements that show the subsystems work properly, and | ||
| - | (b) reference artifacts that show more detail on these measurements. | ||
| - | The presence or absence of the summary memo will not affect the review grade. | ||
| - | |||
| ==== Evaluation Rubrics ==== | ==== Evaluation Rubrics ==== | ||
| Line 93: | Line 87: | ||
| The rubrics used in the evaluation is shown below. | The rubrics used in the evaluation is shown below. | ||
| - | The scoresheets used by the evaluators are available on Box for [[https:// | + | The scoresheets used by the evaluators are available on Box for [[https:// |
| Line 99: | Line 93: | ||
| <nodisp 16> | <nodisp 16> | ||
| - | NOTE TO INSTRUCTORS: | + | NOTE TO INSTRUCTORS: |
| consistent with the scoresheets. | consistent with the scoresheets. | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 119: | Line 113: | ||
| <nodisp 16> | <nodisp 16> | ||
| - | NOTE TO INSTRUCTORS: | + | NOTE TO INSTRUCTORS: |
| consistent with the scoresheets. | consistent with the scoresheets. | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 128: | Line 122: | ||
| |::: ^< | |::: ^< | ||
| |::: ^< | |::: ^< | ||
| - | |::: ^< | + | |Supporting Artifacts -- reviewers spot check ^< |
| - | |Supporting Artifacts -- reviewers spot check ^< | + | |::: ^< |
| |::: ^< | |::: ^< | ||
| |::: ^< | |::: ^< | ||
| | ^< | | ^< | ||
| |< | |< | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| ==== Mechanics ==== | ==== Mechanics ==== | ||
project-wiki/design_reviews/subsystem_engineering_review.1662744439.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/09/09 11:27 by cds4byu
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Copyright Brigham Young University, all rights reserved
